| The Guilt Offering Restitution: Leviticus 6 The guilt offering is different from the sin offering in that it dealt very much with property laws. The difference with the sin offering is that one had to first make restitution by replacing the value of what he'd done someone out of, and then adding to that value a 1/5 of the value. Only when he had done that could he offer the spotless ram to the priest to make atonement for his sin. The guilt offering shows the need for true repentance toward God. After all, the person was making restitution and offering sacrifice, so that he could be restored to God. We must never lose sight of this, offering sacrifice was never to buy God off, but rather it was a matter of faith. The person knew they had offended God by what they had done. To please God they obeyed now in where before they had failed. We must never forget that there was always an "true remnant of Israel" within Israel. We must never lose sight of the fact that only trust in God and the sacrifice could make the sacrifice effective. There was no ritual that automatically dealt with your sins. In dealing with the matter of restitution it would be ridiculous to say that wrongs never had to be made right. Recently there was much uproar in a CapeTown community over a gang leader who was said to have come to the Lord. The community was in outrage and indeed even split among themselves as the gangster had millions of ill gained property and money. That he had not made any effort to make restitution to the community in any way did not look good for Him. Can a thief if he still has the money not restore it to whom it belongs. Levi the tax collector who encountered Jesus in the gospel made right with all the people he had overtaxed. In response Jesus said today salvation has come to you. A person cannot claim to belong to God while they still hold on to ill gotten gains. Where there is no repentance there is no salvation. Leviticus 6 from vs 1 one tells us that deceiving ones neighbor is to sin not just against them, but against God. The example given is in the case of a deposit or security or robbery. If one leaves something with you it means they have trusted you to keep their possession safe. Persons have to accept responsibility when they agree to keep something for people by agreement. This would in our day refer to banks, insurance companies and individuals. A Christian brother once asked to loan my brothers guitar, but when asked whether he was prepared to accept responsibility for it, if anything were to happen. His response wasn't altogether Christian. We need to be cautious and examine our own hearts when someone entrusts their property to us. Ask yourself am I prepared to pay if I damage the persons property even if it is an accident. Next time you loan some ones car, first ask yourself if you are willing to pay if you damage his or her property. Also if someone leaves something with you, to keep for them. Are you willing to take responsibility? |

